PTSD and Alien Abduction – Slaughterhouse-Five Part 2: Crash Course Literature 213


In which John Green continues to teach you about Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut. (WARNING: When Slaughterhouse-Five was published, some of the crude language in the book caused controversy. We quote one mildly controversial line in this video. If you’re mature enough to read this book, you’re likely mature enough to tolerate this quote, but we’re obliged to warn you about it.) Anyway, this week, John is going to talk about Slaughterhouse-Five’s status as an anti-war novel, and what exactly anti-war novels are good for. He’ll also get into the idea of free will, and to what degree Billy Pilgrim’s time-travel and abduction by aliens were hallucinations induced by posttraumatic stress disorder. John will even give you an interpretation of why the Tralfamadorians look like toilet plungers. Hint: it has to do with plunging metaphorical toilets.


Transcript Provided by YouTube:

00:00
Hi, I’m John Green, this is Crash Course Literature, and today we’re going to continue
00:03
our discussion of Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five.
00:05
So, Slaughterhouse Five is often called an anti-war novel. But that raises a question:
00:09
What does it mean for a novel to be against war?
00:12
Are novels in the business of passing judgment? Can they actually change the actual world?
00:17
Well, that’s some of what we’re going to talk about today. So like Kurt Vonnegut,
00:20
our protagonist Billy Pilgrim struggles to make sense of what he has witnessed during
00:24
the Allied firebombing of Dresden in World War II.
00:27
And there’s a tremendous tension between the desire to testify to that violence and
00:31
a need to repress the traumatic memories of it.
00:33
Along the way we’re going to talk about free will and we’ll also probe Billy Pilgrim’s stories of alien abduction.
00:38
MFTP: Mr Green, Mr Green! Alien? Probe?
00:42
Boy, Me From the Past, if you think that’s funny, you’re gonna love the show South Park.
00:45
It comes out in about two years. But anyway, we are going to get to some anatomical humor.
00:49
And I’m sure it will please you.
00:51
[Theme Music]
01:00
So Vonnegut published Slaughterhouse Five in 1969, before the term “post-traumatic
01:04
stress disorder” had entered the language. But Billy Pilgrim clearly exhibits symptoms
01:09
of this condition. I mean, first off, his experiences during the war were definitely traumatic:
01:13
I mean, he gets lost behind enemy lines during the Battle of the Bulge. He is taken prisoner
01:17
by the Germans. He sees a fellow soldier die from gangrene while walking to a POW camp,
01:22
so it goes. He is crammed for days into a train with other POW’s. He survives the
01:26
bombing of Dresden and observes the aftermath of the firestorm, including, like, many charred
01:32
bodies. And then he witnesses a fellow POW being executed for stealing a teapot, so it
01:37
goes. So no wonder Pilgrim experiences flashbacks
01:39
to the war as if these incidents were happening in the present. It’s not surprising that
01:43
he suffers from hallucinations either. But what’s the deal with the toilet-plunger-shaped aliens?
01:48
So here’s an English-y way of looking at it:
01:50
Billy Pilgrim has a lot of blocked up stuff, right? Let’s call it excrement. Toilet
01:55
plungers are in the business of unblocking drains, right? So in other words, fantasies
01:59
involving the Tralfamadorian aliens help Pilgrim work out the shame and horror of his war experience.
02:06
I mean, look, the Germans made Pilgrim strip when he arrives at their camp, right? So do
02:10
the Tralfamadorians. The Germans refuse to answer why they beat one prisoner and not
02:15
another. The Tralfamadorians refuse to answer why they’ve kidnapped Pilgrim. The Germans
02:19
confine Pilgrim to a slaughterhouse. The Tralfamadorians confine him to a zoo.
02:24
So obviously there are parallels between Pilgrim’s past and his fantasy life.
02:27
But in his fantasy world, Pilgrim can rewrite these painful events, right? Like, for example,
02:32
Pilgrim felt emasculated when he was a prisoner of war. He was stripped, forced to don a woman’s
02:37
coat, and ridiculed. But in Pilgrim’s fantasy of alien captivity, he discovers that he can
02:41
“enjoy his body for the first time.” And he claims that the Tralfamadorians consider
02:46
him “a splendid specimen” (if only because they “had no way of knowing” otherwise).
02:51
And he describes himself, famously, as possessing, and here I am quoting, “a tremendous wang.”
02:56
He’s desired by a 20-year-old porn star, he’s incredibly virile, he’s able to sire
03:01
a child almost immediately. I mean, how is that for revisionism?
03:04
It’s the greatest POW experience of all time!
03:07
Now some would say this revisionism is a symptom of madness, but I would argue that it could
03:11
also be seen as a necessary step in the journey toward recovery.
03:14
And then there are the deeper, more philosophical aspects of Pilgrim’s fantasy — particularly
03:19
the Tralfamadorian concept of time and space. Tralfamadorians view past, present, and future
03:24
events all at once. Like one alien explains that these moments exist simultaneously and
03:29
can be viewed much as humans “might see a stretch of the Rocky Mountains.” And since
03:33
an individual can’t change past, present, or future events, the Tralfamadorian vision
03:38
of time and space denies the possibility of free will, right?
03:41
Many classical Greek plays support the idea that individuals are governed by their fate.
03:46
Like you’ll remember our old friend Oedipus, told by the oracle that he would kill his
03:49
father and sleep with his mother, despite his best efforts – he does. And it’s still gross.
03:54
So why are we talking about free will in the context of reading Slaughterhouse Five? Well, let’s go to the Thought Bubble.
03:59
For one thing, the concept of free will is related to the concept of moral responsibility.
04:03
Like in the broadest terms: if one doesn’t have free will, one can’t be responsible
04:08
for one’s behavior. I mean, no matter how heinous the crime that you might commit, you
04:12
can be morally absolved because you had no choice.
04:15
In Slaughterhouse Five, Pilgrim makes some problematic life decisions. I mean, his choice
04:19
of a marriage partner, for one, is not particularly inspired: “Billy didn’t want to marry
04:24
ugly Valencia. She was one of the symptoms of his disease. He knew he was going crazy,
04:29
when he heard himself proposing marriage to her…”
04:31
Yet, his life choices aren’t particularly immoral. I mean he served as a chaplain’s
04:35
assistant in the war (a role in which he is “powerless to harm the enemy or help his
04:40
friends”). He works as an optometrist (a job in which he helps other people see better).
04:44
He supports his family (a role in which he is a provider). So why would Pilgrim want
04:49
to be absolved of moral responsibility? Well it’s obviously because Billy feels
04:53
guilt: Guilt for surviving the Dresden bombings. Guilt for being on the same side as the bombers.
04:58
Guilt for becoming “well-to-do” after the war. In adopting a worldview that denies
05:02
free will, Billy can’t blame himself for surviving, or for being complicit in mass
05:06
murder, or for benefiting financially at the war’s end.
05:09
But we also see this conversation about the relationship between free will and moral responsibility
05:13
reflected in the structure of Vonnegut’s novel.
05:16
Vonnegut framed Slaughterhouse Five with two chapters that at least seem to be narrated
05:20
in his own voice. And at times he even includes himself as a character in the main action.
05:25
(For example, the author appears among the prisoners of war, and again at the Dresden
05:28
corpse mines.) And these appearances help ground the narrative in a form of reality
05:33
that Billy Pilgrim can’t see, our reality. But Vonnegut mainly presents scenes from Pilgrim’s
05:38
perspective and as such, the narrative conflates historical events with fiction and that fiction
05:43
is conflating historical events with fantasies of alien abduction.
05:47
Thanks, Thought Bubble. So since Vonnegut also presents these events
05:50
in the order that Pilgrim experiences them, the narrative jumps back and forth in time
05:55
and space. And that means that in certain ways, Slaughterhouse
05:57
Five is kind of a work of “Tralfamadorian” fiction, right? Pilgrim quotes an alien as
06:01
defining Tralfamadorian fiction as follows:
06:04
“…each clump of symbols is a brief, urgent message—describing a situation, a scene.
06:09
We Tralfamadorians read them all at once, not one after the other. There isn’t any
06:14
particular relationship between all the messages, except that the author has chosen them carefully,
06:19
so that, when seen all at once, they produce an image of life that is beautiful and surprising
06:24
and deep. There is no beginning, no middle, no end, no suspense, no moral, no causes,
06:30
no effects. What we love in our books are the depths of many marvelous moments seen
06:35
all at one time.” Obviously back in 1969, Vonnegut had never
06:38
had the experience of scrolling through a Twitter feed, but I can’t help but notice
06:41
the similarity between his fantasy of Tralfamadorian literature and our reality of the feed-based
06:47
reading experience. Slaughterhouse Five – oh, it’s time for
06:50
the open letter! Oh, it’s my Twitter!
06:52
Dear Twitter, you really are all things at once, but I have to say, you’re kind of
06:56
the worst possible version of Tralfamadorian literature.
06:59
Like I follow Walt Whitman on Twitter, and yes, I am aware that he’s deceased, and
07:02
so sometimes my Twitter feed will literally be, “I contain multitudes,” then followed
07:06
by, “Don’t miss the new season of Rich Kids of Beverly Hills!” I made that show
07:11
up, isn’t that a hilarious idea for a show? Oh my god, are you kidding me? That’s real?
07:16
So I love the idea of your asynchronicity and I love how you unmoor me from time, but
07:20
I’m not sure that you present an image of life that’s beautiful and surprising and
07:23
deep so much as you present distraction. Best wishes, John Green.
07:28
Anyway, Slaughterhouse Five is obviously like Tralfamadorian literature because: 1) it contains
07:32
a series of brief, urgent messages; 2) its scenes are presented out of order (creating
07:37
the effect that they take place “all at once’); and 3) Vonnegut has obviously chosen
07:41
each scene carefully. And yet, it’s not a work of alien fiction.
07:45
It’s a deeply human book that does contain a beginning and a middle and an end, and it
07:50
does depict causes and effects; and it does create suspense, just not in the usual way.
07:55
Billy Pilgrim longs to believe that he can access past moments though time travel. And
08:00
although that might seem misguided, it’s actually a deeply human response to loss.
08:04
I mean, I think we’ve all felt that way. Who isn’t familiar with wanting to go back
08:08
to a time of innocence? In its way, Slaughterhouse Five is an anti-bildungsroman,
08:12
it’s a novel about someone who wants to go back to a world before their education.
08:16
Because Billy Pilgrim’s education has taught him, as the Romans put it, that “man is
08:20
a wolf to man.” One of the most famous aspects of Slaughterhouse
08:23
Five is that Vonnegut repeats the Tralfamadorian mantra “so it goes” each time he mentions
08:27
a death in the novel. It’s a brutal and radically unsentimental way of grappling with
08:31
death, and therein lies its power. I mean, how are we supposed to respond to
08:35
Billy Pilgrim’s mind being destroyed by wartime trauma; how is he supposed to respond
08:39
to it? So it goes. But I think it’s clear in Slaughterhouse
08:42
Five that Vonnegut doesn’t want readers just to accept traumatic events enabled by
08:46
weapons of mass destruction as a matter of course, as part of human life.
08:50
The novel is so intentionally unadorned and unsentimental that he’s aiming to shock
08:54
us out of our passive perspective. But I think Slaughterhouse Five is “Tralfamadorian”
08:58
literature in one sense, at least. As the alien confesses: “What we love in our books
09:02
are the depths of many marvelous moments seen all at once.”
09:06
The word “marvelous” is very interesting there, because, of course, we don’t marvel
09:08
just at the wonderful things, we also marvel at the horrible ones.
09:13
Vonnegut’s gift was to render it all fresh and new, both the great and the terrible,
09:17
and allow us to marvel at it. Because it’s funny and because it’s absurd
09:21
and unflinching, Vonnegut describes mass murder and torture and ordinary death in a way that
09:26
makes it feel real. There are two great modern human dangers.
09:31
First the danger of our proclivity towards mass violence and secondly, the danger of
09:36
us averting our gaze from it. We all know that humans have the ability to distract ourselves
09:41
and in doing so, to tacitly accept the intolerable. I mean frankly, we’re all doing that every
09:46
day, and those dangers are the depths that Vonnegut seeks to expose.
09:50
And in that sense at least, I truly believe that a novel can be against war. Thanks for
09:55
watching; I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is made with the help of these
09:58
nice people and it exists because of your support at Subbable.com, a voluntary subscription
10:02
service that allows you to directly support Crash Course so that we can keep it free for
10:06
everyone forever. There’s also lots of great perks you can
10:09
get at Subbable, like signed posters, so please check it out. Thank you again for watching,
10:12
and as we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome.


This post was previously published on YouTube.

Back to Top