Donald Trump depicts Latinx people in the language of disease, as infestation, as criminals, rapists, as ruthless drug gangs, as simultaneously lazy and as workers attempting to steal jobs from white people, and as breeders and invading hoards that if allowed to cross our borders, will replace the white majority.
Throughout U.S. history, rather than characterizing immigrants and refugees in humanitarian terms, many conservative and white nationalists and nativists use narratives representing refugees as invaders, as barbarians at the gates who, if allowed to enter, will destroy the glorious civilization we have established among the “lesser” nations of the Earth.
The day Donald Trump descended the escalator in his tower of gold, with head raised forward like Benito Mussolini as if holding court at his press conference announcing his run for the presidency on June 16, 2015, he tossed down the bodies of Mexican people like red bloody Trump steaks as his initial stepping stones on his march to the White House.
[Mexico is] sending people that have lots of problems, and they are bringing those problems to us,” he warned. “They are bringing drugs, and bringing crime, and they’re rapists.
Trump has subsequently placed the children of people attempting to gain refugee status into cages, he has ordered a massive buildup of our military to “guard” the southern border from what Trump terms “invaders” from Central America, and he stated that he intends to eliminate the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of citizenship status to people born in the U.S., even if their parents were born elsewhere.
The 2016 Republican Party Platform codified the language by defining the “other” as “illegal aliens,” as if they were dangerous and deadly non-human invaders from deep space.
Trump was also a prominent and outspoken “birther.” He consistently tried to define President Barack Obama as “other” by attempting to prevent our former President the right of self-definition – an apparent contradiction within a political party that emphasizes rugged individualism, freedom, and liberty.
Stereotypes & Scapegoats
A stereotype is an oversimplified, preconceived, and standardized conception, opinion, affective attitude, judgment, or image of a person, group, held in common by members of other groups. Originally referring to the process of making type from a metal mold in printing, social stereotypes can be viewed as molds of regular and invariable patterns of evaluation of others.
Stereotyping can and often does result in singling out individuals and groups as targets of hostility and violence, even though they may have little or nothing to do with the offenses for which they stand accused. This is referred to as scapegoating.
With scapegoating, there is the tendency to view all members of the group as inferior and to assume that all members are alike in most respects. This attitude often leads to even further marginalization.
The origin of the scapegoat dates to the Book of Leviticus (16:20-22). On the Day of Atonement, the high priest selected a live goat by lot. He placed both hands on the goat’s head and confessed over it the sins of the people.
In this way, he symbolically transferred the sins of the people onto the animal, which was then cast out into the wilderness. This process thus purged the people, for a time, of their feelings of guilt, shame, and fear.
When stereotyping occurs, people tend to overlook all other characteristics of the group. Individuals sometimes use stereotypes to justify the subjugation of members of that group. In this sense, stereotypes conform to the literal meaning of the word “prejudice,” which is a prejudgment, derived from the Latin praejudicium.
When demagogues play on people’s fears and prejudices by invoking these images for their own political, social, and economic gains, in more instances than not, this results in loss of civil and human rights, harassment, violence, and at times, death of the “other.”
Throughout history, most dominant groups have depicted or represented minoritized groups in a variety of negative ways to maintain control or mastery. Dominant groups represent minoritized groups through myths and stereotypes in proverbs, social commentary, literature, jokes, epithets, pictorial depictions, and other hegemonic forms.
When looking over this history, for example, we find many clear and stunning connections between historical representations of several minoritized groups, whom dominant groups construct as sub-human (lower “racial”) life forms.
On the Jews
The German Nazis used similar language in its 1940 propaganda film “Der Ewige Jude” (“The Eternal Jew”) representing Jews as plague-ridden hordes of rats. The Nazi’s accepted and advanced the “scientific” view that European-heritage Jews, in fact, all Jews of every so-called “race,” constitute a separate and lower “race” as justification for extermination as if we were vermin.
The Eternal Jew portrays Jews as spreading infection and degeneracy, which, if allowed to continue, would result in the eventual collapse of civilization and its institutions.
In this propaganda film, Jewish people were said to commit 47% of all robberies and to make up 98% of those involved in prostitution. “The Jews,” according to the film’s narrator, “are only one percent of the population” but they know how to “terrorize a great, tolerant nation” by controlling finance, the arts, education, and the media.
On one hand, Jews have been stereotyped as “super capitalists” whose inordinate wealth enables them to manipulate world banking systems and to control politicians and the media through well-financed lobbying campaigns. They are perceived as a “privileged class” highly educated and disproportionately represented in the “cultural elite.”
On the other hand, they are seen as radicals who are attempting to overthrow the capitalist system and the dominant culture. During the “McCarthy Era” at the height of the Cold War, for example, several U.S. Congressional leaders declared that Communists (associated in the public mind at the time with Jews) corrupted the minds of “good upstanding Americans” as well as the integrity of the governmental system, and, therefore, they must be purged from their positions.
During the Middle Ages, for example, Christians characterized Jews as having tails concealed beneath their garments and a peculiar smell. This led to reports that they were in the service of the Devil, actually that the Devil was their father.
The “Judensau,” an anti-Jewish motif that was used in medieval texts and even carved on several churches in Central Europe, depicted a Jew sexually entwined with a pig, sucking the sow’s utter and eating and drinking its excrement.
Furthermore, a 13th-century law forwarded the idea that Jews were less than human by explicitly stating that Christians who had sex with Jews were the same as Christians who had sex with animals. The ravages of the Black Death throughout Europe, which wiped out an estimated one-fourth to one-half of the population in the 12th and 13th centuries were also blamed on Jews, who were accused of poisoning drinking wells.
Christians charged Jews with transmitting other diseases as well, most notably syphilis, which they referred to as “the Jewish disease” throughout Europe in the 19th century, even though the incidence of syphilis within the Jewish community had been no higher than in the larger population.
Medical literature of the time alleged that syphilis was spread to newly circumcised Jewish infants through the practice of metsitsah, the sucking of the penis by the mohel (the ritual circumciser) to stop the bleeding. Fellatio thus became not only a marker of “perversion” but also a sign of the Jewish transmission of disease.
The Anti-Defamation League accused Trump of “conjuring painful [antisemitic] stereotypes and baseless conspiracy theories” in his language and in his political ads. Jonathan Greenblatt, the organization’s chief executive, wrote:
Whether intentional or not, the images and rhetoric in [Trump’s] ad touch on subjects that anti-Semites have used for ages. This needs to stop.
In addition, the Anti-Defamation League found that in counties hosting a Trump rally in 2016 experienced a 226% increase in reported hate crimes.
On a more basic and personal level, the rhetoric of invasion taps into our psychological fears, or more accurately, terrors of infection: our country, our workplaces, and more basically, our private places in which “aliens” forcefully penetrate our bodies, into our orifices, and down to the smallest cellular level.
Modern day white supremacists/neo-Nazis believe that only white Anglo-Saxon Protestant heterosexuals have been granted a soul by God. Everyone else they refer to as “mud people,” those without a soul and without meaning, value, or worth.
As hundreds of white nationalists lined the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia (August 12, 2017) to protest the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from downtown Lee park, some waved Confederate and Nazi flags, brandished shields, and marched with burning torches. They shouted racist, antisemitic, and homophobic slurs repeating “JEWS WILL NOT REPLACE US!” At one point, they loudly chanted in unison: “FUCK YOU FAGOTS!”
What these white, mostly male, presumably heterosexual protesters have in common is a belief in a “white ethno-state” according to Southern Poverty Law Center Research analyst Keegan Hankes. He referred to the so-called “alt-right” or far-right movement as a “grab bag of right-wing ideologies.”
“They believe that white people are being systematically replaced and that inheritance to their homeland is being taken away from them,” Hankes told NBC News. “There’s this belief that basically white people are being replaced faster than they can reproduce.”
While Hankes acknowledged that not all white nationalists are homophobic, he argued that the majority of right-wing extremists are “virulently anti-LGBT,” and that they reveal an anxiety and obsession about white birth rates, which are just barely keeping pace with those of racialized minorities.
Hankes asserts that many of these extremists may blame the birth rate disparity on the nationwide legalization of marriage for same-sex couples.
Politicians and most other residents of the United States alike, from every rung along the full political spectrum, generally agree on one issue: our immigration system is severely broken and needs fixing. Seemingly insurmountable gaps in political solutions to repair the system along with Congressional inaction to the point of blockage have brought the country to the point of crisis.
Though politicians and members of their constituencies argue immigration policy from seemingly infinite perspectives and sides, one point stands clear and definite: decisions as to who can enter this country and who can eventually gain citizenship status generally depends of issues of “race,” for U.S. immigration systems reflect and serve as the country’s official “racial” policies.
The murder of eleven Jewish congregants, and injury to 6 others, including 4 police officers at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, and one woman at the Chabad Synagogue in Poway, California, in addition to a spike of 57% of reported antisemitic incidents in 2017 over just one year earlier, indicate that Jews and other marginalized groups remain at increased risk.
The murder of 19 primarily Latinx people and the wounding of dozens more at a shopping center in El Paso, Texas, the murder of 6 worshipers and wounding of 4 at a Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, and the murder of 9 black congregants at Emanuel AME Church all attest to the rising tide of white nationalist terrorism in the United States.
Donald Trump, this white supremacist terrorism Radicalizer-In-Chief, has built his political career on stoking white grievance and nativist supremacy. As such, though he did not pull the triggers on the firearms of mass carnage, he is complicitous in aiding and abetting these domestic terrorists.
The Unite the Right rally, Charlottesville, Virginia brought together white supremacists, members of the alt-right, neo-Confederates, neo-fascists, white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and far-right militias. They killed a counter-protester by plowing a car into the crowd.
“I think there is blame on both sides,” said Trump about the rally. “You had a group on one side that was bad. You had a group on the other side that was also very violent. Nobody wants to say that. I’ll say it right now.”
He criticized “alt-left” groups that he claimed were “very, very violent.” He later stated that “There were very fine people on both sides.”
Donald Trump, through his actions and through the bullhorn of his rhetoric, has moved the once right-wing political extremes front and center into the mainstream, and along the way, has empowered and enabled the hate and the haters to thrive.
Now a symbolic winter has come, the long night has come not only to Game of Thrones, but as it seems, to the United State. But a game it is not.
White nativists compete, react, slaughter for dominance. Prior wars are forgotten between these supremacists as they forge fresh alliances. They organize and search for power and treasure through divisions, never contemplating that sharing can supplant the ethic of divide and conquer, that peace can supersede war, that “power with” can surpass “power over.”
The White Walkers represent the collective unconscious, searching, tracking, coming for us. We can defeat them when we know ourselves, our pasts, our todays when we imagine coming closer toward the conscious visionary thinkers we are and can still become.
No, this is no game at all. Rather it is a world’s saga. We have come to a normalization of burying our dead as despots blare jingoist cries.
We renounce our rights, our liberty for false promises of security. Authoritarians invent subversive invading nemeses to gain, maintain, and enhance their stranglehold, which threatens destruction from the within the nation itself.
No, this is no game at all.
It is, rather, a mirror, a cautionary tale, a glimpse into our tomorrows lest we alter, change, correct course, for we now stand at that existential cut-off point.
What’s your take? Comment below or write a response and submit to us your own point of view or reaction here at the red box, below, which links to our submissions portal.
If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member, today.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.
A $50 annual membership gives you an all-access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class, and community.
A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group, and our online communities.
A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.
Register New Account
Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.
Image ID: 697530391